Editor's Note: This was written as a respone to somone asking
how NLP has modeled Extra Sensory Performance.
The Application of NLP in Extended Sensory Performance
I mostly find it interesting that the term extra
sensory performance is generally related
to an ability beyond the normally accepted
senses. E.g., sight, smell, taste, feel, hear, and
the vestibular system. Many, when what they
are experiencing doesn't seem to fit
inside of what they have come to BELIEVE
as normal, begin using terms such as
Psychic, or extra sensory perception.
However, as best as I can gather, much
of this extra sensory performance is not
outside of our accepted senses, but rather
a response to something not fitting inside
of what we have come to accept as normal.
As far as I am concerned, we are all sense.
That is, as far as perception goes, we
need to be able to make the distinction
between what is coming in through our
extraordinary sensory apparatus, and that
which we are responding as a method of
using past information that we have installed
internally. And, that which is coming through
our senses and being filtered by what we
have already installed internally.
Many times I have found myself modeling
young, preverbal children. Especially when
they are discovering the world through their
own sensory apparatus. And, well before
they have begun the process of making any
conscious, or unconscious distinctions about
what they are sensing.
I believe that what is called Psychic, or extra
sensory perception, is simply an activity of
utilizing our sensory apparatus in a way that
goes beyond our internal system of
classification.
Now, depending on how far into this you
want to go, you can actually create amnesia
for how you now understand the world,
and begin again by simply exploring your
ongoing experience without having
to filter any of the experience through your
own present world model. Sort of like how
these young preverbal children are
experiencing the word.
Further, it has been my experience that
a larger majority of people have organized
their world models to move toward
understanding. I am suggesting a move
in the opposite direction. One in which you
do not care to understand anything at
all. But to navigate through your surroundings
with absolute curiosity, never really applying
meaning to anything that comes through any
of your senses.
Not to far from where I live, there is this
wonderful Indian community. people whom
have come to the US from India, and have
spent the time building a community that
resembles home for them. Every so often,
I like joining there community. At first, I did
not understand one word these people were
uttering. I could go there, immerse myself in
this other reality, and simply wonder what
was being said as they shared their
experiences one with another.
Another experience I have had that sort
of mirrored this, was when I first got behind
the wheel of a car that was designed for
left hand driving, and drove down a road
that was opposite of what I had come to
experience as normal. Although I was able
to adapt quickly, I did have that period of
time in which I was able to enjoy having
my neurology out of sync with what I had
come to understand.
Sure, there are ways in which you can tune
up your sensory apparatus so that you can
slow the world down, thus speeding things
up on the inside. But, I do believe that there
would be more usefulness if you first develop
the ability to alter the meaning of what is
coming in through your senses. This way,
rather than more of the same, you wind
up first building in difference.
Consider this. A near as I can tell, most
people not only enjoy the experience of
rapport, but they also seek it out. But,
more of the same will always mean more
of the same. So, another idea would be
to seek out difference. Because it is when
we are experience difference, that we are
providing ourselves with an opportunity to
challenge our world model the most.
Now, what does all of this have to do with
exploring extra sensory performance? Everything.
In the model I am offering, extra isn't really all
that extra, as it is only a response to something
that we perceive as being different than what
we have become familiar with, and have accepted
as normal. And since history has proven that there
is no such thing as normal. That through time we
continue updating the maps we are using to
understand our worlds. Then we can begin
using our brains as a means of deliberately
challenging what we have come to know.
Now, when I tell people that I can learn things
as quickly as I can, the first thing most of these
people do is to go inside, compare what I am
saying to what they have come to believe as
TRUE, thus either deleting, or distorting the
meaning of my offering. Yet through all history,
there has always been new information that
first met it's match by coming up against a
firmly held belief system, only later to become
the norm. But, either side of that coin leaves
something to be desired. Because on the one
side, there is little reason being applied to
what is being introduced. e.g, how many different
ways can I test this before jumping to any
conclusion, And on the other side of this same
coin is the repetition of a pattern that finally
accepts this new information as TRUE, only
later having to have it challenged again when
new information comes along.
As far as I am concerned, genius is not about
knowing, but rather knowing that you do not
know, and perhaps never will, and being totally
comfortable with that reality. When you talk about
enhancing things, especially your ability to improve
on what you are calling perceptual possibilities, I
would first suggest that you begin by building
in a belief system that allows you to begin
re-coding all of what you have experienced
and have coded through your own life, and
begin accepting it all as only tentative at best.
This way, you can open yourself up to begin
questioning everything you have in the past
come to believe as true. This way, you can
explore anything you want to without having
to first disprove it only because it does not
fit well inside your previous understandings
of the word. When I go down to the retirement
home to enjoy playing checkers with the old
timers, one of the most common things I hear,
is how much the world has changed. This
is expected I guess. But what continues to
surprise me, and I have thought about this
long and hard, is how surprised so many
of these old timers when they say it. Me,
I not only expect the world to change more
each day, but I have come to begin having
more responsibility for my part in how the
world changes.
It's like anything else. You get into your
car, and more times than not, you know
where you are going. It's not like you just
wind up somewhere. But, I think it would
be a good idea of you deliberately got off
at the wrong exit, so to speak. That you
took the time once an a while just to discover
where you would wind up. Having a direction
is a great thing. But, working hard at trying
to control each step along the way isn't.
When I think of some of the greatest thinkers
of all time. The inventors. The scientists. The
Musicians. The one common thread that
continues to pop up is the notion of the
accident. I was intending this, and this
happened. But in all, if people were really
good at maintaining their perceived world
models, we would still be living in caves.
So rather than just accept what you think
is there, challenge it. This way, you can
cycle between having rapport with yourself,
and breaking that rapport. In the end, you
will find that there is more. In fact, not only
is there more. But there is so much more
that we don't even have a clue to think
about yet. And for those who know what
is true and will fight! Why bother? Things
are going to change anyway, and you can
have a choice. You can simply fight, then
accept what comes along. Or you can
be part of the equation. Things will change.
So rather than just be the recipient of those
changes, become the engineer.
Well, I have to go for now. It time to
go out and experience something new.
Something different.
Carmine
|